Essai gratuit
Compare

Stop stitching software together.

Every tool on this page solves one slice well. The question is who is doing the integration between the slices — and in most service businesses, the answer is the owner, by hand, every week.

Field-service software

Good at running schedules and jobs, but the financial story often lives somewhere else.

  • Calendar and operations
  • Customer workflow
  • Separate financial context

Accounting software

Good at transactions and books, but separated from the work that created those numbers.

  • Transactions
  • Tax and ledger
  • Separate operating context

Spreadsheets + chat

Flexible, but the owner becomes the integration layer and every connection depends on memory.

  • Manual updates
  • Manual follow-up
  • Manual reconciliation

Galaxy Unit

Customers, jobs, team, expenses, invoices, profit, bookkeeping and Copilot read from one connected business.

  • Operational + financial context
  • Job-level profitability
  • AI that sees the whole system
Head to head

Detailed comparisons.

Each one lists where the other product is genuinely stronger. If a comparison page never admits that, it is marketing, not information.

Galaxy Unit vs JobberJobber runs field service. Galaxy connects the work to the money behind it.Scheduling and invoicing are solved on both sides. The difference is job costing, receipts and tax living in the same system as the work.Read the comparison →Galaxy Unit vs QuickBooksQuickBooks counts the money. Galaxy connects the work that produced it.Accounting software records transactions after the fact. A connected operating system produces those numbers as a by-product of running the business.Read the comparison →

Votre entreprise est déjà connectée.
Votre logiciel devrait l'être aussi.

Gérez le travail, l'argent et la paperasse comme un seul système.

Commencer gratuitement Voir avec des données d'exemple